>
Economic Policy
>
Global Trade Wars: Who Wins and Who Loses?

Global Trade Wars: Who Wins and Who Loses?

10/01/2025
Marcos Vinicius
Global Trade Wars: Who Wins and Who Loses?

In 2025, escalating tariffs and countermeasures reshaped global commerce, altering fortunes and exposing vulnerabilities.

Timeline of 2025 Trade Conflict

The year began with cautious optimism as global trade expanded by about $500 billion in the first half.

However, mounting tensions reached a climax when key players imposed unprecedented levies.

  • March: Canada and Mexico enact 25% retaliatory tariffs on US goods.
  • April 4: China responds with 34% tariffs across multiple sectors.
  • April 8: The US raises reciprocal duties on China to 84%, de-minimis at 90%.
  • By mid-year: US average effective rate hits 22.5%, highest since 1909.

Global Trade Trends Amid Tensions

Despite frictions, global trade continued to record gains—manufacturing led the surge.

Electronics and automotive goods rose by 2.5% quarter-on-quarter, while services trade climbed 4%. Yet, trade policy uncertainty loomed large, threatening to reverse gains.

Trade imbalances narrowed: China’s surplus with the US fell, the EU’s surplus shrank, and deficits widened in Japan, India, and the UK.

US Tariff Policies and Retaliation

The US ramped up tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico, reaching peaks above 145% before settling around 30%.

These measures aimed to protect domestic industries but spurred widespread retaliation.

  • April spikes: US–China duties jump to unprecedented levels.
  • Canada/Mexico hit back with 25% on key agricultural and auto exports.
  • China retaliates broadly, targeting electronics and machinery.

Macroeconomic Fallout in the United States

By year’s end, US real GDP growth was cut by 0.9 percentage points in 2025, with long-run output lowered by 0.6% annually. Projections warn of up to a 6% reduction by 2054 under sustained barriers.

Consumers felt the pinch: tariffs drove a 2.3% rise in prices, especially in apparel (+17%). The average household faced an average household loss of $3,800 in 2024 dollars, with a middle-income family losing about $22,000 over a lifetime.

  • Real wages down 1.4% by 2028.
  • Employment and participation fall by 1.1% and 0.65%, respectively.

Impact on Key Global Partners

Countries with heavy US trade exposure bore the brunt, while some found unexpected gains.

While export-oriented economies with limited options suffered, some like the UK and Turkey benefited from improved terms of trade as competitors faced higher barriers.

Winners and Losers

The conflict produced stark contrasts.

  • Losers: Consumers and exporters in Canada, Mexico, Ireland, and US trade-exposed states.
  • Winners: Protected US manufacturers (short term), tariff-light countries (UK, Turkey), and national treasuries collecting duties.

However, US government thrift from tariffs—netting $3.1 trillion over a decade—was offset by $582 billion in negative dynamic effects, illustrating the trade-off between revenue and growth.

Sectoral and Political Ramifications

Manufacturing hubs felt sustained supply chain disruptions, with auto and electronics sectors hit by component shortages. Textile and apparel producers led price spikes, while steel and aluminum tariffs introduced in 2025 continued to reverberate.

Politically, higher consumer costs and job losses fueled public discontent. Governments scrambled to offer fiscal relief, increasing public investment by 0.6 percentage points of GDP over 2025–27 to cushion shocks.

Global Risks and Institutional Responses

Institutions like the IMF and ECB warned of stagflation risks, urging caution against further escalation. Heightened policy uncertainty and tariff cycles raised the chance of a downturn.

By mid-2025, J.P. Morgan placed the probability of a global recession at 40% global recession risk, up from 30% earlier in the year.

Looking Ahead: Paths to De-escalation

As 2026 approaches, negotiators weigh phased tariff rollbacks in exchange for stronger trade rules on digital services, intellectual property, and labor standards.

Potential off-ramps include multilateral tariff reductions under WTO auspices, targeted sectoral exemptions, and confidence-building measures to lower policy uncertainty. Business leaders advocate for supply chain diversification, fostering resilience against future shocks.

The coming year offers a pivotal choice: entrench protectionist barriers or rebuild trust and unlock sustainable growth.

Marcos Vinicius

About the Author: Marcos Vinicius

Marcos Vinicius